Paul Harding Paris, 22/12/2023
on current choices and events. Within our context, P.D. alludes to an entrenched pattern of
politics merging with football, perpetuated over time, creating a self-reinforcing loop of
increasing returns. Any efforts to divide this bond between football and politics consequently
become difficult because of this reinforcing cycle, established by their interactions. In addition,
external factors such as national pride, social importance given to football, and geopolitical
ambitions—only to cite a few examples—have further solidified this interdependence. Over the
years, football has acted as a symbolic representation of national identity, a tool for soft power
projection, but also as a platform for social and political messaging. A good example of this is
Saudi Arabia (SA), which strategically uses football as a tool for extending its soft power.
Through high-profile signings of star football players, SA aims to reshape its global image
tarnished by controversies such as the Yemeni war and Khashoggi’s murder. This aligns with
Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman’s broader “Vision 2030” modernization initiative,
despite facing criticism for its authoritarian rule behind the façade of progress.
I could come up with an endless list of examples showing how interdependent politics
and football are. But I would rather extrapolate, and ask the following questions: taking into
account path dependency and increasing returns, is it even conceivable to have a future where
football and politics would be distinct? Politics-free football? Could change agents bring about
change, whether gradual or sudden? I think not, and most of the articles on this topic share the
same opinion. Football, and sports in general, don’t exist in a vacuum: social, political, and
economic contexts shape both football and our response to it. However, we still often hear that
“sport should not be politicized” as expressed by French President Macron ahead of the 2022
World Cup, or FIFA’s mantra of “no politics.” Now, of course, this plays out at different levels:
one could, rightly so, distinguish between the political role of the players and contrast it with
that of the people who make major decisions. Such nuances will not be addressed here but are
still crucial to keep in mind, as people usually tend to only consider the bigger picture and
overlook such distinctions.
I don’t think we will live to see a critical juncture, whether driven by exogenous or
endogenous factors, that would enable some dramatic change to happen and cause politics and
football to be separated. The profound significance that football currently holds worldwide
makes it inherently political; no critical juncture in the past has untied this mutually interlocking
relationship and, as P.D. keeps strengthening it, the scope of the critical juncture needed to undo
this knot is becoming impossibly large.